I have a question, on talking in gloria jeans today (yes, we did manage to have a few minutes of conversation where Bec didn’t twist everything ridiculously immaturely; it was amazing) the subject of Maddi’s boyfriend came up, and reasons for and against him remaining that way. She declared I had to put the question of which side outweighs the other to you guys (not that it’ll change anything, she’s rather in love with him), but she thinks it’ll be amusing.
So tell me:
- Cute, adorable and has no tact
vs
- Can’t catch trains, doesn’t like ravioli or eat interesting pizza.
It’s obviously the most important question of the day.
All pizza is interesting. Pizza with only cheese is minimalist, pizza with no topping whatsoever is interpretive, pizza with spice is challenging, and pizza with anything else just tastes nice.
In any case, He can’t catch trains. There’s no argument :V
Trains! Ravioli! What?! Dump him!
At first I was joking, but in all seriousness, I couldn’t live life like that. Fussy eating and immobility wears you down, so, in all seriousness… Yeah… no.
Of course you could try training him instead =
That boy needs to learn to embrace the wonders of ravioli. It is delicious. He probably just hasn’t had any really, really good ravioli. Otherwise he would be in love with pasta and not Maddi
And he also needs to learn how to catch trains. I’m sorry. There’s no excuse for not being able to catch a train.
Not that it will matter much in Maddi’s eyes.